Friday Funnies: Comforting a Grammar Nazi
Friday, 21 December 2012 23:43Today's Friday Funny combines one of my biggest pet peeves with one of my all time favorite comic strips.

This particular homophone issue has been handled previously in
fandom_grammar by
melayneseahawk in another Friday Funny and
chiroho in a Blast From the Past about a year ago, as well as
green_grrl's article from 2008.
I do want to point out that there are some countries where the use of "Nazi" would not be prudent, so usually said person would be called a "Grammar Fiend" or some other variation on that.
I don't know about any other grammarians, but this one is tied with your/you're and to/two/too for a grammar-related issue that can set my blood to boiling instantly when I see it. It's also one of my big reasons to advocate for a beta, because spellcheck doesn't always catch these issues. And don't get me started on that period that should actually be a comma, or the missing period at the end of the phrase.
So what do you do to make sure you don't confuse these homophones?

This particular homophone issue has been handled previously in
I do want to point out that there are some countries where the use of "Nazi" would not be prudent, so usually said person would be called a "Grammar Fiend" or some other variation on that.
I don't know about any other grammarians, but this one is tied with your/you're and to/two/too for a grammar-related issue that can set my blood to boiling instantly when I see it. It's also one of my big reasons to advocate for a beta, because spellcheck doesn't always catch these issues. And don't get me started on that period that should actually be a comma, or the missing period at the end of the phrase.
So what do you do to make sure you don't confuse these homophones?
no subject
22/12/12 08:35 (UTC)no subject
23/12/12 06:06 (UTC)no subject
22/12/12 15:55 (UTC)So what do you do to make sure you don't confuse these homophones?
When I'm not sure, I speak the sentence fragment out loud, without any contractions I mostly get confused with its vs it's and who's vs whose, and saying it clears up any confusion (at least for me).
*sees shadow; ducks back into lurkerdom*
no subject
23/12/12 06:06 (UTC)no subject
22/12/12 16:20 (UTC)This attitude is my pet peeve. I just have to speak up about this holier than thou attitude about the above homophone mistakes. I know the difference, and I'm sure that goes for many more writers, but some of us process differently than you do. When I type, my thoughts flow onto the keyboard, and my fingers are blind and deaf to the wrong spellings. Worse, when I proofread, my brain sweeps the copy clean. Aware of my weakness, I maintain a checklist of my top fab typos at the top of the working document and word search for your/you're, etc even before sending it to my beta--I don't want to overwhelm her.
no subject
22/12/12 19:33 (UTC)no subject
22/12/12 19:55 (UTC)no subject
28/12/12 01:35 (UTC)While I would never go and flame anyone on YouTube (who does that?), I confess after years of proofreading semi-professionally (not a full-time proofreader but it's been part of my work life for a long time), it's very difficult to turn your brain off when it comes to grammar mistakes, even the relatively easy to confuse ones.
no subject
23/12/12 06:17 (UTC)no subject
22/12/12 19:49 (UTC)Generally, the contractions "they're", "it's" and "you're" are best subvocalized as "they are", "it is" and "you are" to prevent typing the wrong word.
no subject
23/12/12 06:10 (UTC)Oh, I actually like that term! I think I'll have to start using that!
no subject
23/12/12 20:14 (UTC)