Answer: How is "y'all" spelled and why?
Monday, 11 January 2010 08:10With examples from Firefly.
I do understand where the confusion comes from. After all, we have "you’ll," "she’ll," "we’ll," "they’ll," and so on, so why not "ya’ll"?
Well, because that’s not how contractions work. A contraction takes a word phrase, removes the separation between the words, yanks out a syllable, and puts an apostrophe there instead. Note, the apostrophe always goes where the removed letter or letters were.
So we have “you” and we have “all.” Smoosh (highly technical grammar term there) them together, take out the unspoken “ou” and indicate that you did so with an apostrophe, and voila! Y’all. It doesn’t match all of those other “ll” endings because those are contractions of the verb “will” with the unspoken “wi” taken out. It’s like this:
You’ll = you + will
-Smoosh them together: youwill
-Take out the syllable nobody says: youll
-Use an apostrophe to indicate the missing letters: you’ll
Mal: You don't know me, son. So let me explain this to you once: If I ever kill you, you'll be awake, you'll be facing me, and you'll be armed.
Simon: Are you always this sentimental?
(“Serenity”)
Y’all = you + all
-Smoosh them together: youall
-Take out the syllable nobody says: yall
-Use an apostrophe to indicate the missing letters: y’all
Mal: Y'all are making a big deal and I would appreciate it if one person on this boat did not assume I was an evil, lecherous hump.
(“Our Mrs. Reynolds”)
This dialectal contraction is most frequently heard in the southern United States. Its use has spread (these days I hear it not infrequently where I live, which is about as far from south as it’s possible to get in the contiguous U.S.), but you’re still probably best off using it within that dialect.
Bonus lecture: Contrary to popular belief, “all y’all” is not the plural of “y’all.” "Y’all" is plural all on its own, a construction designed to distinguish between the singular and plural “you.” Rather, “all y’all” is used the same way as “all of you,” to specify every member of a group, not just some.
no subject
11/1/10 22:52 (UTC)Good. However, I also hear both y'all down here (the South). See, I'd conjugate it y'all, both y'all and all y'all. ;)
The South is so fun. :)
no subject
12/1/10 00:47 (UTC)no subject
13/1/10 20:19 (UTC)My Grama uses words that I can't even pronounce and I was born there!!
no subject
13/1/10 22:16 (UTC)no subject
11/1/10 22:54 (UTC)no subject
12/1/10 00:57 (UTC)no subject
13/1/10 07:40 (UTC)God yes! Because God needs a better pronoun than "it" or "He" or "She".
no subject
13/1/10 07:38 (UTC)no subject
13/1/10 22:19 (UTC)Yes. Yes, we do, and "y'all" is so much more natural and elegant than "you guys" or, heaven forbid, "yous." Which I have heard.
no subject
12/1/10 00:25 (UTC)Did that make sense?!
no subject
12/1/10 01:05 (UTC)no subject
12/1/10 01:33 (UTC)no subject
12/1/10 14:48 (UTC)I'm so glad some people with more experience with the dialect have chimed in here to expand on the usage! Thank you.
no subject
13/1/10 07:34 (UTC)no subject
13/1/10 22:26 (UTC)no subject
13/1/10 22:23 (UTC)No, that's not it at all. They are speaking to you, a singular person, but referring to you + whoever else was working on the project with you = a group. Y'all is therefore still plural; we Southerners understand what is meant. Northerners often do not, and thus mistake the proper use of the word.
If you overhear a Southerner saying "y'all" to one person in conversation, pay close attention to how the other Southerner responds, because the response will generally indicate that there were other people being referenced. "Did y'all have a hard time on that project?" will be answered with, "Yeah, we did, but we got it in on time."
no subject
13/1/10 23:43 (UTC)